http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/09/11/05/211...

Also, to add to hackintosh's post – while apple has no legal right to stop an individual from making a hackintosh, an individual has no legal right to make apple support it. If apple can do something to break compatibility with non-supported hardware, they have every right to (and if you can find a hack or mod that brings support back or works around it, you have every right to). If you want a hackintosh safe from being broken in an update (and that you know will have drivers, etc.), then use the same hardware that apple uses/has used. If you want a fully supported Mac system, then buy it from Apple. If you don't mind saving some money and making a custom system at the cost of having to use hacks and be wary of updates, then build a hackintosh. That's the trade-off – just like with my hacked Wii; I have every right to hack my system, but I can't then expect Nintendo to support it and I must to wait on updates until I can confirm they're ok. That's just how it works, and I see nothing unfair about it: I can do whatever I want with my stuff, but the companies that make my stuff have no obligation to provide support and working updates for uses and modifications they never intended.

why are you either surprised or annoyed to have problems on a completely unsupported architecture on a completely unsupported platform? part of the fun is solving these problems yourself.