<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel Atom Cedar Trail platform to support HD video?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/intel-atom-cedar-trail-platform-to-support-hd-video.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/intel-atom-cedar-trail-platform-to-support-hd-video.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 23:03:44 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: oryoki</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/11/intel-atom-cedar-trail-platform-to-support-hd-video.html/comment-page-1#comment-33149</link>
		<dc:creator>oryoki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=15352#comment-33149</guid>
		<description>Intel tried to squeeze Nvidia Ion out by making the GPU an integral part of the Pine Trail CPU silicon.  But people want the ability to play video smoothly, and this is keeping Ion in the game despite its extra cost.  So the Empire strikes back with Cedar Trail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intel tried to squeeze Nvidia Ion out by making the GPU an integral part of the Pine Trail CPU silicon.  But people want the ability to play video smoothly, and this is keeping Ion in the game despite its extra cost.  So the Empire strikes back with Cedar Trail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
