<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows 7 + netbooks = lower battery life?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:41:52 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fteacher</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-2#comment-42112</link>
		<dc:creator>fteacher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-42112</guid>
		<description>I am using a toshiba sattellite pro L300 ez1502 and I tried XP vista and Windows 7 I have experienced more battery life in vista, less in XP and the least in Windows 7. now I am using windows 7 and I may return to XP because I have been experiencing dvd player problems and battery life problems. it lasts less than an hour when full</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using a toshiba sattellite pro L300 ez1502 and I tried XP vista and Windows 7 I have experienced more battery life in vista, less in XP and the least in Windows 7. now I am using windows 7 and I may return to XP because I have been experiencing dvd player problems and battery life problems. it lasts less than an hour when full</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notebook and Netbook Users – Windows 7 or XP?&#160;&#124;&#160;Komplett Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-2#comment-41906</link>
		<dc:creator>Notebook and Netbook Users – Windows 7 or XP?&#160;&#124;&#160;Komplett Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-41906</guid>
		<description>[...] looking at the NB205’s capabilities, Liliputing – who live and breathe compact computing, said that, “What’s interesting is that Windows 7 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looking at the NB205’s capabilities, Liliputing – who live and breathe compact computing, said that, “What’s interesting is that Windows 7 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julesdubois</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-2#comment-41663</link>
		<dc:creator>julesdubois</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-41663</guid>
		<description>Well, on my hp 6735 since i installed windows seven, my battery died and am asked to replace it...at the first installation i lost one hour of the battery and slowly the battery died&lt;br&gt;(u will excuse ma english) I am French</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, on my hp 6735 since i installed windows seven, my battery died and am asked to replace it&#8230;at the first installation i lost one hour of the battery and slowly the battery died<br />(u will excuse ma english) I am French</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: climbtree</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-2#comment-40968</link>
		<dc:creator>climbtree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-40968</guid>
		<description>i wonder if more efficient use to the hardware is to blame. squeezing more power out of the silicon means more power is squeezed out of the battery</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wonder if more efficient use to the hardware is to blame. squeezing more power out of the silicon means more power is squeezed out of the battery</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Notebook and Netbook Users &#8211; Windows 7 or XP? &#171; Komplett Ireland</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-2#comment-40670</link>
		<dc:creator>Notebook and Netbook Users &#8211; Windows 7 or XP? &#171; Komplett Ireland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-40670</guid>
		<description>[...] looking at the NB205’s capabilities, Liliputing – who live and breathe compact computing, said that, “What’s interesting is that Windows 7 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] looking at the NB205’s capabilities, Liliputing – who live and breathe compact computing, said that, “What’s interesting is that Windows 7 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solarboy</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-2#comment-40261</link>
		<dc:creator>solarboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-40261</guid>
		<description>This is an issue that Microsoft is trying to ignore. W7 has MAJOR issues with the ACPI which make them potentially liable for the damage to millions of laptop batteries. On Microsofts own Technet forums this has been raging for 6 months with MS refusing to comment.&lt;br&gt;See &lt;a href=&quot;http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itprohardware/thread/c6c043e6-eeb1-4e61-870d-896ca2f865d6?prof=required&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an issue that Microsoft is trying to ignore. W7 has MAJOR issues with the ACPI which make them potentially liable for the damage to millions of laptop batteries. On Microsofts own Technet forums this has been raging for 6 months with MS refusing to comment.<br />See <a href="http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w7itprohardware/thread/c6c043e6-eeb1-4e61-870d-896ca2f865d6?prof=required" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w.." rel="nofollow">http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/w..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean Gilberry</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-2#comment-37725</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean Gilberry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 06:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-37725</guid>
		<description>Yeah, while you&#039;re getting all your graphics dark, make sure and empty the hard drive too.  All the extra data on the drive makes it heavier and thus increasing power necessary to spin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, while you&#39;re getting all your graphics dark, make sure and empty the hard drive too.  All the extra data on the drive makes it heavier and thus increasing power necessary to spin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: r4i software</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-34971</link>
		<dc:creator>r4i software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 09:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-34971</guid>
		<description>Laptos battery does not depends on the operating system.It&#039;s depends on the graphics that you are using.You have to use dark color graphics for more battery life because it use less power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laptos battery does not depends on the operating system.It&#39;s depends on the graphics that you are using.You have to use dark color graphics for more battery life because it use less power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ddoso</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-33897</link>
		<dc:creator>ddoso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 07:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-33897</guid>
		<description>I recently bought an Asus 1005HA Premium eee pc with XP preloaded on it. I got a sweet deal on windows 7 Professional so i decided to do an upgrade. With XP i got close to 9 hours of battery life (never 10 or 10.5 hours like advertised, but i was still happy) with bluetooth disabled, wifi on, and screen at about 30-40% brightness. I am thrilled with windows 7. It&#039;s been great so far. Though, I noticed a difference in battery life immediately. It now says that a 100% charge gives roughly 7.5-8 hours. And that estimate is optimistic. I really get more like 5.5-6.5 hours. It&#039;s kind of annoying, but I&#039;ve been messing around with the power and display settings so I think I&#039;ve collectively increased the total time to about 7 hours now. However, even though it kinda sucks, I don&#039;t mind sacrificing an hour or so for a much needed OS upgrade. Hopefully Asus or Microsoft fix any battery consumption problems with some updates. But, I&#039;m probably being optimistic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently bought an Asus 1005HA Premium eee pc with XP preloaded on it. I got a sweet deal on windows 7 Professional so i decided to do an upgrade. With XP i got close to 9 hours of battery life (never 10 or 10.5 hours like advertised, but i was still happy) with bluetooth disabled, wifi on, and screen at about 30-40% brightness. I am thrilled with windows 7. It&#39;s been great so far. Though, I noticed a difference in battery life immediately. It now says that a 100% charge gives roughly 7.5-8 hours. And that estimate is optimistic. I really get more like 5.5-6.5 hours. It&#39;s kind of annoying, but I&#39;ve been messing around with the power and display settings so I think I&#39;ve collectively increased the total time to about 7 hours now. However, even though it kinda sucks, I don&#39;t mind sacrificing an hour or so for a much needed OS upgrade. Hopefully Asus or Microsoft fix any battery consumption problems with some updates. But, I&#39;m probably being optimistic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thiefraccoon</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-33131</link>
		<dc:creator>thiefraccoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-33131</guid>
		<description>i installed win7 ultimate on aspire one (with SSD) and i get more than 20% less battery life. but it is win7 ultimate and using all graphic interface stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i installed win7 ultimate on aspire one (with SSD) and i get more than 20% less battery life. but it is win7 ultimate and using all graphic interface stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Anything Replace Windows XP As the Best Netbook Operating System? - SlashGear</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-32864</link>
		<dc:creator>Can Anything Replace Windows XP As the Best Netbook Operating System? - SlashGear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-32864</guid>
		<description>[...] battery life – According to reports from LAPTOP Magazine and Liliputing, Windows 7 Starter edition is getting an average of 40 minutes less battery life than netbooks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] battery life – According to reports from LAPTOP Magazine and Liliputing, Windows 7 Starter edition is getting an average of 40 minutes less battery life than netbooks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Πιο ενεργοβόρα από τα XP τα Windows 7 : Γιά τους μαθητές του Λυκείου και όχι μόνο&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-32806</link>
		<dc:creator>Πιο ενεργοβόρα από τα XP τα Windows 7 : Γιά τους μαθητές του Λυκείου και όχι μόνο&#8230;.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 08:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-32806</guid>
		<description>[...] τριών διαφορετικών ιστοσελίδων διεξήγαγαν δοκιμές σε δημοφιλή netbooks και [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] τριών διαφορετικών ιστοσελίδων διεξήγαγαν δοκιμές σε δημοφιλή netbooks και [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Los netbooks con Windows 7 tienen menos autonomía &#171; inetworks</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-32717</link>
		<dc:creator>Los netbooks con Windows 7 tienen menos autonomía &#171; inetworks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-32717</guid>
		<description>[...] menos eso es lo que exponen tres tests comparativos, realizados y publicados en Laptopmag, liliputing y jkOnTheRun, en los que se compara la autonomía que consiguen varios netbooks con cada versión [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] menos eso es lo que exponen tres tests comparativos, realizados y publicados en Laptopmag, liliputing y jkOnTheRun, en los que se compara la autonomía que consiguen varios netbooks con cada versión [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows 7 más tragón que XP en Netbooks (Déjà Vu) &#124; MuyWindows</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-32677</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows 7 más tragón que XP en Netbooks (Déjà Vu) &#124; MuyWindows</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-32677</guid>
		<description>[...] Leer &#8211; Liliputting: Windows 7 + netbooks = lower battery life? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Leer &#8211; Liliputting: Windows 7 + netbooks = lower battery life? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Testes apontam que Windows 7 consome mais bateria que XP em netbooks &#124; Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/windows-7-netbooks-lower-battery-life.html/comment-page-1#comment-32627</link>
		<dc:creator>Testes apontam que Windows 7 consome mais bateria que XP em netbooks &#124; Microsoft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 15:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14405#comment-32627</guid>
		<description>[...] mas hoje parece que nem tudo saiu tão bem assim. Segundo testes realizados pelo Laptop Mag, Liliputing e jkOnTheRun, o Windows 7 tem, em média 47 minutos de bateria a menos que seu antecessor do ano de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] mas hoje parece que nem tudo saiu tão bem assim. Segundo testes realizados pelo Laptop Mag, Liliputing e jkOnTheRun, o Windows 7 tem, em média 47 minutos de bateria a menos que seu antecessor do ano de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
