<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More details on Samsung&#8217;s OLED netbook display &#8211; Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/more-details-on-samsungs-oled-netbook-display-video.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/more-details-on-samsungs-oled-netbook-display-video.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:10:30 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zima</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/more-details-on-samsungs-oled-netbook-display-video.html/comment-page-1#comment-31925</link>
		<dc:creator>zima</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14337#comment-31925</guid>
		<description>Netbook with an OLED is a total misunderstanding. OLED displays are purely active screens, relying only on their own light to show image; nobody has yet made transflective version of them (if it can even be done...)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So yeah, when there&#039;s not a lot of light around (like...in a computer show floor) they might look gorgeous. They might even still look like that when used on a TV, or desktop replacement laptop (both used pretty much only inside). But when there&#039;s really a lot of light around, the only thing  left is to crank up the brightness. And that can&#039;t go far in battery powered device. Screens that _reflect_ the light OTOH - even bright sunlight won&#039;t swamp them; in fact they rely on it to remain crisp and usable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For truly portable devices - screens that can also reflect light are a much better idea. Check how it is in cellphones: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/item/Sun_sun_sun_And_I_cant_see_a_thing_on_my_phone.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/item/Su...&lt;/a&gt; there is an AMOLED screen there, and it looks really bad compared to transflective screens. PixelQi would work good too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netbook with an OLED is a total misunderstanding. OLED displays are purely active screens, relying only on their own light to show image; nobody has yet made transflective version of them (if it can even be done&#8230;)</p>
<p>So yeah, when there&#39;s not a lot of light around (like&#8230;in a computer show floor) they might look gorgeous. They might even still look like that when used on a TV, or desktop replacement laptop (both used pretty much only inside). But when there&#39;s really a lot of light around, the only thing  left is to crank up the brightness. And that can&#39;t go far in battery powered device. Screens that _reflect_ the light OTOH &#8211; even bright sunlight won&#39;t swamp them; in fact they rely on it to remain crisp and usable.</p>
<p>For truly portable devices &#8211; screens that can also reflect light are a much better idea. Check how it is in cellphones: <a href="http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/item/Sun_sun_sun_And_I_cant_see_a_thing_on_my_phone.php" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/item/Su.." rel="nofollow">http://www.allaboutsymbian.com/features/item/Su..</a>. there is an AMOLED screen there, and it looks really bad compared to transflective screens. PixelQi would work good too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomleemullins</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/more-details-on-samsungs-oled-netbook-display-video.html/comment-page-1#comment-31436</link>
		<dc:creator>tomleemullins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14337#comment-31436</guid>
		<description>IMO; OLED is the future of computer displays. It uses less engergy and crisper/clearer than regular LCD screens. I hope they sell it at a reasonable price. A netbook with an OLED screen is ideal for the above reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO; OLED is the future of computer displays. It uses less engergy and crisper/clearer than regular LCD screens. I hope they sell it at a reasonable price. A netbook with an OLED screen is ideal for the above reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrAzY 4 WoRlD &#124; New Samsung OLED Netbook Display</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/more-details-on-samsungs-oled-netbook-display-video.html/comment-page-1#comment-31391</link>
		<dc:creator>CrAzY 4 WoRlD &#124; New Samsung OLED Netbook Display</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 21:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14337#comment-31391</guid>
		<description>[...] provides a 1024 x 600 pixel resolution, a 100,000:1 contrast ratio, and 300cd/m2 brightness.[Liliputing].[Source]         Submit this to Script &amp; StyleShare this on BlinklistShare this on [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] provides a 1024 x 600 pixel resolution, a 100,000:1 contrast ratio, and 300cd/m2 brightness.[Liliputing].[Source]         Submit this to Script &amp; StyleShare this on BlinklistShare this on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samsung's OLED Netbook Display</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2009/10/more-details-on-samsungs-oled-netbook-display-video.html/comment-page-1#comment-31390</link>
		<dc:creator>Samsung's OLED Netbook Display</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:57:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=14337#comment-31390</guid>
		<description>[...] [Liliputing] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [Liliputing] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
