<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Asus Eee Box with Celeron processors coming soon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.liliputing.com/2008/12/asus-eee-box-with-celeron.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/12/asus-eee-box-with-celeron.html</link>
	<description>Compact Computing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 19:50:24 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/12/asus-eee-box-with-celeron.html/comment-page-1#comment-10814</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3389#comment-10814</guid>
		<description>Same here.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;ve been looking for a computer for my in-laws, who&#039;ve never really used one. An Eee Box would be perfect if it had a modem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same here.</p>
<p>I&#39;ve been looking for a computer for my in-laws, who&#39;ve never really used one. An Eee Box would be perfect if it had a modem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey Blue Eyes</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/12/asus-eee-box-with-celeron.html/comment-page-1#comment-10812</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Blue Eyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 15:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3389#comment-10812</guid>
		<description>This may also be a laughable question but what would be faster: 1.6 GHz Atom or 1.2 GHz Celeron?  Both are single core but Atom is hyperthreaded.  Some applications, e.g., Folding@Home, can only use one core so it only uses half of an Atom CPU but it would theoretically use all of a Celeron.  Yes, the Celeron would run hotter and consume more power than Atom, but it&#039;s not a power hog like a full Core 2 Duo, et al.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may also be a laughable question but what would be faster: 1.6 GHz Atom or 1.2 GHz Celeron?  Both are single core but Atom is hyperthreaded.  Some applications, e.g., Folding@Home, can only use one core so it only uses half of an Atom CPU but it would theoretically use all of a Celeron.  Yes, the Celeron would run hotter and consume more power than Atom, but it&#39;s not a power hog like a full Core 2 Duo, et al.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven522</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/12/asus-eee-box-with-celeron.html/comment-page-1#comment-10810</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven522</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3389#comment-10810</guid>
		<description>Ditto on that sentiment.  If I take a small box like this down to my parents house for hookup, it would have to have a modem (internal or external) as they have no highspeed internet available to them wireless or other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto on that sentiment.  If I take a small box like this down to my parents house for hookup, it would have to have a modem (internal or external) as they have no highspeed internet available to them wireless or other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickey Blue Eyes</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/12/asus-eee-box-with-celeron.html/comment-page-1#comment-10808</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickey Blue Eyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3389#comment-10808</guid>
		<description>Hey, that&#039;s a good point!  Surely a modem can&#039;t be that expensive or take up that much space.  These little low power boxes don&#039;t NEED gigabit connections.  One could argue that the wireless network adapter is overkill.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are more usb wireless network adapters than there are usb modems out there.  For a low cost low power computer, it would be good for someone who doesn&#039;t have an expensive broadband connection.  A low cost dialup isp would be more appropriate for someone to get basic internet connectivity.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I agree with you, Nate.  A modem would be more appropriate for these boxes than, say, wireless or a gigabit network adapter.  It would certainly expand the potential customer base to those who don&#039;t have a broadband connection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, that&#39;s a good point!  Surely a modem can&#39;t be that expensive or take up that much space.  These little low power boxes don&#39;t NEED gigabit connections.  One could argue that the wireless network adapter is overkill.  </p>
<p>There are more usb wireless network adapters than there are usb modems out there.  For a low cost low power computer, it would be good for someone who doesn&#39;t have an expensive broadband connection.  A low cost dialup isp would be more appropriate for someone to get basic internet connectivity.</p>
<p>I agree with you, Nate.  A modem would be more appropriate for these boxes than, say, wireless or a gigabit network adapter.  It would certainly expand the potential customer base to those who don&#39;t have a broadband connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/12/asus-eee-box-with-celeron.html/comment-page-1#comment-10805</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 14:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3389#comment-10805</guid>
		<description>I know a lot of people are going to laugh at this, but I think it should be pointed out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don&#039;t you think a low end machine, like this, should have a modem built in?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Believe it or not, there are still people out there that don&#039;t have computers, and if they were to get one, would want the cheapest way possible to get online. I&#039;d think fixed income types are the ones who would be most interested in a system like this, and I doubt they&#039;d be popping for broadband.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know a lot of people are going to laugh at this, but I think it should be pointed out.</p>
<p>Don&#39;t you think a low end machine, like this, should have a modem built in?</p>
<p>Believe it or not, there are still people out there that don&#39;t have computers, and if they were to get one, would want the cheapest way possible to get online. I&#39;d think fixed income types are the ones who would be most interested in a system like this, and I doubt they&#39;d be popping for broadband.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Riccardo</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/12/asus-eee-box-with-celeron.html/comment-page-1#comment-10758</link>
		<dc:creator>Riccardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3389#comment-10758</guid>
		<description>Hi, &lt;br&gt;new EeeBox has been annunced, with HDMI output and ATI video card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, <br />new EeeBox has been annunced, with HDMI output and ATI video card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/12/asus-eee-box-with-celeron.html/comment-page-1#comment-10756</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3389#comment-10756</guid>
		<description>Do you know if the 220 will be more powerful than the 1.6 Atom? I would love to use the Eee Box as a replacement for my Aopen Mini PCs as media centers. My units are up in years sporting a Centrino M750 cpu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know if the 220 will be more powerful than the 1.6 Atom? I would love to use the Eee Box as a replacement for my Aopen Mini PCs as media centers. My units are up in years sporting a Centrino M750 cpu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/12/asus-eee-box-with-celeron.html/comment-page-1#comment-10755</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 21:35:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3389#comment-10755</guid>
		<description>Slot loaded DVD drives are an expensive component ... That being said, Asus should have a more expensive model with one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slot loaded DVD drives are an expensive component &#8230; That being said, Asus should have a more expensive model with one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven522</title>
		<link>http://www.liliputing.com/2008/12/asus-eee-box-with-celeron.html/comment-page-1#comment-10744</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven522</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.liliputing.com/?p=3389#comment-10744</guid>
		<description>I still say that the main thing missing from these &quot;Box&quot;es are a CD drive.  I can easily see not having one in a netbook for portability, but having a CD reader at a minimum seems like a requirement for a desktop system.  And if you&#039;re talking about making it a low profile media center pc, then a DVD reader would be a minimum.  It wouldn&#039;t take that much extra space/power/expense to throw in a slot loader CD/DVD reader, would it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still say that the main thing missing from these &#8220;Box&#8221;es are a CD drive.  I can easily see not having one in a netbook for portability, but having a CD reader at a minimum seems like a requirement for a desktop system.  And if you&#39;re talking about making it a low profile media center pc, then a DVD reader would be a minimum.  It wouldn&#39;t take that much extra space/power/expense to throw in a slot loader CD/DVD reader, would it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
